- Can Mammogram Radiation Cause Breast Cancer?
- Vitamin D: The Wonder Vitamin
- Thermography vs. Mammography for Early Breast Cancer Detection: Who Benefits Most?
- The Breast Kept Secret Movie Preview
- Breast implants: the ticking time bomb in millions of women’s bodies
- Surgeons Admit That Mammography Is Outdated and Harmful to Women
- Can These Common Medical Tests & Treatments Give You Cancer?
- Are Mammograms the Best Breast Cancer Test?
- An Uncommon, Early-Warning Sign of Breast Cancer
- Breast Reconstruction: Get the Facts Before You Decide
- March 2020
- February 2020
- February 2019
- January 2019
- June 2018
- April 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- July 2012
- April 2012
March 14, 2020 Breast, Breast Cancer, breast health, breast thermography, Breasts, Cancer, cancer screening, diagnosis, digital infrared thermal imaging, Health, healthcare, mammogram, mammography, medicine, no radiation, prevention, radiation
January 8, 2019 alternative, alternative health, Breast, breast health, breast thermography, Cancer, cancer prevention, cancer screening, diagnosis, digital infrared thermal imaging, disease, doctor, early detection, Health, healthcare, healthy, inflammation, infrared imaging, mammogram, mammography, proactive, radiation, thermal imaging, thermography
Well-known medical practitioners discuss mammography and thermography. Have a look to hear what they have to say.
April 2, 2018 Breast, Breast Cancer, breast screening, breast thermography, Cancer, cancer screening, diagnosis, early detection, FDA, Health, health care, mammogram, mammography
Every year, millions of women flock to their doctors to get their annual mammograms, a breast cancer screening procedure that involves pressing a woman’s breasts between two metal platforms to scope out tumors. But surgeons everywhere are starting to question the controversial practice, which studies show isn’t even an effective screening tool, and is actually harmful to the bodies of women who receive it.
The public is told that mammograms are the only way to catch breast cancer early, but a review of eight scientific trials evaluating the procedure, found that mammography is neither effective nor safe. After looking at data on more than 600,000 women between the ages of 39 and 74 who underwent the procedure on a routine basis, researchers found that many women are misdiagnosed. Many of these same women are consequently mistreated with chemotherapy, resulting in their rapid demise.
As published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the review concluded that mammography causes more harm than good, because many more women end up being misdiagnosed and mistreated than those actually avoiding the development of terminal breast cancer. Thus, the procedure known as mammography is an outdated scourge that belongs in the history books of failed medical treatments, and not at the forefront of women’s medicine.
“If we assume that screening reduces breast cancer mortality by 15% and that overdiagnosis and overtreatment is at 30%, it means that for every 2000 women invited for screening throughout 10 years, one will avoid dying of breast cancer and 10 healthy women, who would not have been diagnosed if there had not been screening, will be treated unnecessarily,” the authors concluded.
Group of top medical experts admits mammography does more harm than good
One year after this review was published, a second one published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) came to a similar conclusion. A team of medical professionals that included a medical ethicist, a clinical epidemiologist, a pharmacologist, an oncologic surgeon, a nurse scientist, a lawyer and a health economist, decided that the medical industry’s claims about the benefits of mammography are essentially bunk.
They found that for every 1,000 women screened in the U.S. over a 10-year annual screening period beginning at age 50, one breast cancer death would be prevented, while a shocking 490 to 670 women would have a false positive, while 70 to 100 would undergo an unnecessary biopsy. Between three and 14 of these women, the study found, would also be over-diagnosed for a non-malignant form of cancer that never even would have become “clinically apparent.”
This study out of Switzerland corroborates another out of Canada – the 2014 Canadian National Breast Screening Study – which concluded in lockstep with the others that mammography screenings do not reduce mortality rates from breast cancer any better than a simple physical examination. In other words, the procedure is completely unnecessary, and in many cases exceptionally harmful.
And on and on the list goes, with data out of Norway and elsewhere confirming that mammography isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be. U.S. data spanning the course of nearly 40 years shows that more women are over- or misdiagnosed with breast cancer because of mammograms than are successfully early-diagnosed with breast cancer in such a way as to protect against metastasization. This represents an exceptionally poor track record that calls into question why mammography continues to be used when it clearly doesn’t work.
“I believe that if you did have a tumor, the last thing you would want to do is crush that tumor between two plates, because that would spread it,” says general practitioner Dr. Sarah Mybill, as quoted in the documentary film The Promise.
To see the original article, click here.